Suppose a market exists where there are only two firms. Assume
that the firms (called A and B) are symmetric, which means that
they have identical costs. Assume also that they produce a homogeneous
(identical) product. The market demand and firm A and B's costs
are:
Market Demand: | P = 100 - qA - qB | (P = market price, q = output) |
There are two possibilities: (1) they maximize their own profits,
or (2) they maximize their collective (joint) profits. We'll consider
both.
1. If each firm maximizes its own profits.
This is saying that the firms are engaged in (typical) competitive behavior. To maximize their own profits, the firms must produce where their own marginal revenue is equal to their marginal cost. Each firm's MR and MC are:
Firm A's MR | MRA = 100 - 2qA - qB |
Firm B's MR | MRB = 100 - qA - 2qB |
Firm A's MC and AC | MCA = ACA = 20 |
Firm B's MC and AC | MCB = ACB = 20 |
A. Find equilibrium output for each firm.
Firm A | Firm B | |
1. Set MR = MC | 100 - 2qA - qB = 20 | 100 - qA - 2qB = 20 |
2. Solve for (own) q | qA = 40 - 0.5qB | qB = 40 - 0.5qA |
3. Plug qA equation into qB equation | qB = 40 - 0.5(40 - 0.5qB) | |
4. Solve for qB* | qB* = 80/3 | |
5. Plug qB* into qA equation | qA = 40 - 0.5(80/3) | |
6. Solve for qA* | qA* = 80/3 |
B. Find the equilibrium market price.
1. Plug qA* and qB* into the market demand equation | P = 100 - (80/3) - (80/3) |
2. Solve for P* | P* = $140/3 |
C. Find each firm's equilibrium profits.
Firm A | Firm B | |
1. Find (P - AC)q* for each firm | ((140/3) - 20)(80/3) | ((140/3) - 20)(80/3) |
2. Calculate profits | pA* = $711.11 | pB* = $711.11 |
Summary: the firms each produce 80/3 units, charging a common
price of $140/3 and making $711.11 in profits.
2. If the two firms maximize their collective profits.
This is says that the firms are colluding and may have formed
a cartel. It is as though the firms merged into a single firm
(forming a monopoly). The cartel sets the (market) marginal revenue
equal to their marginal cost. The cartel's MR and MC are:
Cartel's MR | MRC = 100 - 2Q |
Cartel's MC and AC | MCC = ACC = 20 |
A. Find equilibrium output and price for the cartel.
Firm A | |
1. Set MR = MC | 100 - 2Q = 20 |
2. Solve for Q* | Q* = 40 |
5. Plug Q* into market demand | P = 100 - (40) |
6. Solve for P* | P* = $60 |
B. Find each firm's equilibrium profits.
Firm A | Firm B | |
1. Find each firm's output share | qA* = 40/2 = 20 | qB* = 40/2 = 20 |
1. Find (P - AC)q* for each firm | (60 - 20)20 | (60 - 20)20 |
2. Calculate profits | pA* = $800 | pB* = $800 |
Summary: the firms each produce 20 units, charge a common price
of $40 and make $800 in profits. With a lack of competition, we see prices rising and output falling.
If the firms operate independently, maximizing their own profits,
they make profits of $711.11. However, if they collude, then
they can make profits of $800. Direct collusion is illegal in
the United States, but even if it were not there are reasons why
many cartels would not remain intact for long.
3. Collusion and the incentive to cheat
When firms form an agreement to fix prices (i.e. collude) there
is always some incentive to cheat on the agreement. To understand
why, consider the following.
Suppose firm A decides to increase their output slightly, to 80/3 units (i.e. the amount they would produce if maximizing their own profits). This would have no effect on their own AC, but would change the market price. Firm A would produce 80/3 units while B would continue producing their share of the cartel output, so the price would be: P = 100 - (80/3) - 20 = 160/3.
Profits for firm A become: pA* = ((160/3) - 20)(80/3) = $888.89
While firm B's profits are: pB* = ((160/3) - 20)(20) = $666.67
Firm A obviously benefits, at firm B's expense, from cheating on the collusive agreement.
Of course, once firm B realizes that firm A is doing this, then
firm B should increase their output too. The result is that the
cartel falls apart and both firms end up producing their original
(competitive) output levels. This problem illustrates a classic conflict between maximizing one's own welfare - in this case, profits - vs. that of the group.